As some of you may notice, I don’t write too much political items in this blog, even though the book it’s inspired does have a pro-American angle. I don’t do it because most of the stuff I’d probably be writing would be echoed by several other like-minded web sites and blogs all over the Internet. I also have stances and areas of interest that are outside of a usual Teabagger web site. You can’t swing a lolcat in the online world without hitting a blog bitching at Pilosi for demanding a vote for a bill that she refuses to read until after it passes or a wacko czar who’d probably join in on a crew calling some unpopular child gay (Think of the slur) and make him believe that he is in fact gay before he would protect him. I don’t feel that I should just add my voice to the mass din. I do have my own areas I bitch about, such as how schools treat their students, bullying that goes too far, or even giving props to the President whenever he does something good.
But every now and then I have something to say that I need to get off my chest, and this time it has to be about this “Living Document” philosophy I hear from every other lawyer or lawmaker. You especially hear them from Progressives who want to do something the Constitution can’t address and just goes on record and wishes that the Constitution—which isn’t really that old in comparison to every other country—should adapt to what they think is reality.
They might not want to hear it, they would pine and whine about how it should be, it should be, it just CAN’T do that. If you studied Objectivism, you’ll hear this Law of Identity: A=A. It applies with the Constitution.
That’s the first part of a five part series. You’ll find the whole series here: http://www.the912project.us/forum/topics/judge-andrew-napolitano-the
I’ve studied the document, both in college and recently with the Tea Party movement, and while I’d love to see the document given a 2.0 treatment with the amendments written into the main document and with today’s language just out of curiosity, it has no place for it for anything about judicial activists, social justice, health care, or anything else, nor should there be. What the Constitution does—and does it very well today—is provide guide rules on how the three branches of government work, what it can and cannot do, and assign what rights and areas that the government is not allowed to infringe upon. That’s all it addresses. It can not become anything else just like Up can’t be Down or Red can’t be Blue. Bitch all you want, but A can’t be anything other than A and you just come off as some basement living kid being told they play too much World of Warcrack.
If you want to understand where I’m coming from, think of the many parts of a car. Or a computer. The constitution is the government’s engine, or processor, and it’s been working just fine for over 200 years—like I said, it’s not that old. Think of England, France, Italy, and all the other countries and how long they’ve been around. America’s still a young country, in it’s late teens in comparison—and the first rule of thumb in maintaining cars, computers, or anything else will be “If it ain’t broke, don’t fuck with it.” The engine can’t be the transmission, the headlights, the bucket seats, or the radio. The processor can’t be the memory, the harddrive, the viewscreen, or the USB drive used to Readyboost the computer. They can’t be changed to address other parts and endanger its ability to fill the role that it is designed to. Such as it is with government. When Obama complained that the Constitution “does not mandate or allow for redistribution of wealth.” it’s because it wasn’t designed to be, not because of any flaws in the document. If you want a government-supported organization that does allow aid to the unfortunate, you need to do it with a separate document, passed and implemented in accordance to the guidelines of the still relatively new Constitution. Or if you absolutely need to change the Constitution you go through the Amendment process. Doing any other way, such as the Living Document belief or the need to look into foreign laws that shouldn’t have any hold here, is just doing a dick move and upending your own credibility.
Because if you don’t respect a document that shows the supreme law of the land and still works perfectly well, what makes me think you’ll respect laws that you’ll pass yourself?
Until next time, I wonder why BAM should be more popular than unwatched movies that get awards on prime time television award shows? The Oscar was fought between an Anti-US/Human movie and an Anti-US/Military movie.
Also:
You want to see why World of Warcrack turns so many lives into basement dwellers? http://www.cracked.com/article_18461_5-creepy-ways-video-games-are-trying-to-get-you-addicted.html
Holy Crap! Never mind the Chicago way—Vince McMahon is going into politics (finally!) Try to deny it, Linda: http://www.linda2010.com/ Vote for her, Connecticut, or a WWE Superstar’ll turn you into grease.
Chaves is a dictator and Penn is an idiot: http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2010/03/08/sean-penn-wants-reporters-jailed-calling-chavez-dictator/